Hi, Looking at previous discussions about "yet another licence change" I wonder if the real client of the exercise really isn't OpenStreetMap US but some company whose name starts with Map*
This should be disclosed. The Foundation doesn't need a new licence for our data. 1+ for Mr. Henk. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Henk Hoff <[email protected]> wrote: > It is interesting to read that not the OSMF, but OSM-US is the client for > this license exercise. To me, the license is the prerogative of the > Foundation, not a local chapter (either official or presumed to be). > > > > This discussion should be led on Foundation level. I assume the Board is > taking action to get this issue resolved. > > > > Cheers, > > Henk > > > > > > Van: Christian Quest [mailto:[email protected]] > Verzonden: zaterdag 20 februari 2016 15:05 > Aan: Richard Weait <[email protected]> > CC: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>; > [email protected] Talk <[email protected]>; talk-us > <[email protected]> > Onderwerp: Re: [Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] license changes > > > > Again, and again, and again... and each time from the US if I'm not wrong. > > > > 2016-02-18 23:35 GMT+01:00 Richard Weait <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Steve Coast <[email protected]> wrote: >> Any license change process, or anything remotely close to it, should be >> open and transparent. It should involve the community from the start and any >> company that wants to participate too. > > I'm aligned with that. > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > > -- > > Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France > > > _______________________________________________ > osmf-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk > -- -S _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
