On 23/03/2016 12:22, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
On 16-03-23 12:20:35, Andy Townsend, wrote 0.3K characters saying:
On 23/03/2016 12:07, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
Again, that's not the goal if it. As said above, the role is NOT to
change
tags, but to remove redundancies.
It doesn't matter. All of the screed that I wrote yesterday applies
to "redundant data" too - we need to understand how it got there, and
what actually is wrong.
Yep,
as I said on another mail:
Link please. You've said lots of things, but much seemed very
"handwavy" and not really understanding of the issues.
the majority comes from two 'bad' imports.
Link please - exactly which ones, run by whom and when?
The rest is so scarce that it could be considered as noise (edits made
before multipolygons existed, etc…).
... and again, where users have edited any of the data post import, we
still need to understand how the current situation (imported data +
modifications) got to be as it is.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
