Concerning borders, Wikipedia could have a different way of dealing with
disputed territories, and OSM way of handling things may or may not be
appropriate.
Yves
Le 28 avril 2016 22:38:37 GMT+02:00, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> a
écrit :
>Simone,
>I'm not a Wikimedia user but maybe you could clarify a question for me.
>Under the con's is the statement "in many cases OpenStreetMap's
>territorial
>borders are bad or outdated" Where does this opinion come from? Please
>understand that I'm not necessarily disagreeing, but it seems to be a
>broad
>generalization.
>
>One of the Pro arguments might be "If the map data is wrong, you can
>fix
>it."
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Simone Cortesi <sim...@cortesi.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> currently being discussed on mediawiki is the future of maps soon to
>> be added to wikipedia.
>>
>> page:
>>
>https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Maps/Conversation_about_interactive_map_use
>>
>> talk page:
>>
>https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Maps/Conversation_about_interactive_map_use
>>
>> I would ask you to have a look at it and respond by adding your
>> opinion to the pages.
>>
>> It is a great chance to have your say on the maps that will be seen
>on
>> one of the most visited websites in the world.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> S.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
>
>--
>@osm_seattle
>osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
