>Osmose seems to follow the rule: One feature, one OSM element (or one feature, one tag) and avoids duplicating data.
imho=yes #1. in Hungary - we don't have housenumber imports .. so all housenumber collected by mappers. And sometimes exist in the building - and most of the times not. And it is very hard to communicate that some shops allowed the "addr:housenumber" - and others not. imho : - this rule is not beginner friendly. #2. As I know, the iD Editor is not following this rule .. And the "contact:housenumber" is not used by projects ( = editors ) http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Ahousenumber#projects Probably we need to add the "addr:housenumber" to the exception list [1] because this "practice is firmly established and unlikely to change. " [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Imre 2016-06-01 10:16 GMT+02:00 althio <[email protected]>: > > > Łukasz Stelmach > >> >> Can you explain why Osmose (and does it matter at all) warns about >> duplicate housnumber when a shop (node) with a set of addr:* tags is >> created inside a building (area) that is also tagged with addr:*? > > > > Osmose seems to follow the rule: One feature, one OSM element (or one > feature, one tag) and avoids duplicating data. > > The rationale is certainly close to: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema > > where you can use: > - addr:* tags for buildings or nodes on the street > - contact:* tags for contact information about a POI > > Best, > > -- althio > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
