2016-07-10 23:56 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann <chris_horm...@gmx.de>: > On Sunday 10 July 2016, Éric Gillet wrote: > > > > In contrary to the Contributor Terms, these rules : > > > > - Are not shown to new contributors > > - Are not accepted by new or existing contributors > > Maybe that is because they don't apply to the vast majority of > contributors. You don't need to accept the automated edit rules to > contribute to OSM as long as you don't do automated edits. >
If you do a search-and-replace on 20 elements and review manually the change, it is covered under the AE CoC. I don't think of that as an advanced or uncommon task. > > > - Doesn't seem to have been voted on before their "establishment" > > - Seems to have been written by an eminent, but small set of > > contributors (history > > Doesn't this also apply for the Contributor Terms? > Yes, it does. But it's mainly the combination of these points that is problematic. > > Remember OSM is largely a do-ocracy - those who put work into developing > the rules have a significant influence on their content. It shouldn't forbid to re-evaluate them. This does not > make them illegitimate. This doesn't make them legitimate either.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
