I'm surprised Wikidata is different to Wikipedia. I thought the former
was derived from the latter.
(btw The 7,172,036 figure isn't the latest data in Wikidata)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London
Cheers
Dave F
On 26/08/2016 11:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2016-08-26 12:20 GMT+02:00 Dave F <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
All tags can get filled with useless data.
Good use of tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107775
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107775>
btw, there seem to be some less useful tags also on this node, at
least there's a slight redundancy and these could eventually be pulled
from wikidata (or determined spatially in the first case) when needed:
is_in:country
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in:country?uselang=en-US>
United Kingdom
is_in:country_code
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in:country%20code?uselang=en-US>
GB
is_in:iso_3166_2 GB-ENG
On the other hand I have noticed that wikidata has this population:
7,172,036 while osm has 8.416.535, for wikidata the most recent figure
is from 2001 so ours is likely more recent and relying completely on
wikidata for some tags seems still a bit too early.
Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
