In some aspects wikipedia is completely different than OSM, for example WP has the rule of "no original research", we on the other hand want exactly that (via survey). Adding a WP article on an object would require you finding citable third party sources with information on the object, it is not enough that you've been there and have seen say a sign is not enough.
Simon Am 14.11.2016 um 15:11 schrieb RB: > I just discovered the wikidata project and felt like contributing and > adding wikidata tags to OSM objects. However, as I discovered that > localities (such as Javerne > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/421656183>) aren't mostly covered > by wikipedia articles, I created a few. This led to all the 3 > localities pages I had created being deleted by the wikipedia moderators. > > Is it like an official policy and if yes is it still worth to link > localities to orphan wikidata objects? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
