On 4 January 2017 at 15:55, Andy Townsend <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/01/2017 15:36, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> Please quantify that; against the total number of Wikidata tags.
> 214 changes in that changeset; at first glance 82 civil parishes in there > likely to be in error if they have the "Dunham on Trent" problem - about > 38%. I'm pretty sure the total number of Wikidata tags on OSM is now in the tens, if not hundreds, of thousands. Third time of asking: would you accept a single random bad tag/changeset on OSM as evidence that "tags in OSM are already of low quality"? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
