On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2017 01:57:54 -0500 > Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > > I think it's time that we seriously reconsider how stop signs, yield > > signs and traffic calming devices are handled in all but the most > > simple (all approaches to the affected node apply) cases. [..] I'm > > thinking it's time to start mapping this similar to how we handle > > enforcement and turn restrictions, ie, with relations, for all but > > the simplest of cases, especially since the whole forward/backward > > direction=* thing is nonapplicable to nodes by design. > > Do you have in mind something like > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement ? > > From the points of view of edition and data modeling, I believe that it > is the way forward. > Yes, precisely. It's at least a good starting point. > From the point of view of data consumers, it requires grokking > relations - which is currently not common. Would that be a reason not > to choose that method ? > I don't think so. I consider Osmand to be the reference implementation for mobile navigation based off OSM data and it definitely understands enforcement relations.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
