On Wednesday 26 July 2017, Clifford Snow wrote: > A contact in Microsoft said that the Bing imagery is made up of > multiple images which results in the date range.
That is definitely not the case locally on a tile basis in most situations but it is of course possible that Microsoft manages image data and metadata on a larger scale where multiple images are dealt with in sets and not individually. > The imagery we are getting has improved over time, although it seems > at a snails pace. [...] Just to make this clear: My mail was not in any way a complaint that the images are too old. IMO for OSM extending high resolution coverage would often be more important than updating images - after all high interest areas are usually also covered in other sources than Bing and it is not that costly to supplement older high resolution images with newer low resolution images to be able to see where things have changed. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
