On Friday 04 August 2017, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Which doesn't mean that there's no room for improvement, but calling > this a "strict" policy certainly means you haven't read a lot of > trademark policies ;)
I meant 'strict' here in a purely relative sense compared to the current practice, not in absolute terms. For this you would be right, i have next to no knowledge of trademark policies elsewhere and before getting into comparative analysis here we would also have to think about what kind of organization the OSMF can actually be compared to in this field. So i stick to looking at what we have now and what this policy would change. I am sorry if this was not apparent from what i wrote. And in case this is not clear: I have not yet formed an opinion on the matter, i am still in the process of analyzing what effects a change in policy (from essentially no rules to these - however strict or lenient you might consider them) will have. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk