Hi,
Am 2017-10-07 um 09:11 schrieb Roland Olbricht:
> I strongly suggest to oppose the proposal. To do so, you need to add
>
> {{vote|no}} --[[User:<Username>|<Name or username>]] date
>
> under the headline == Voting == once voting is opened. Said in short:
> Adding more contradictions and confusion in public transport mapping
> makes a too complex topic worse in terms of complexity.
>
> In detail, there is a whole bunch of reasons
>
> […]I agree with the reasons given by Roland although I would not write them that harsh. There is another reason why I oppose. The proposals suggests the usage of light_rail=yes and route=light_rail but the Public Transport version 2 schema it is based on does not contain the route type "light_rail". That type was added after the voting (not by the author of the proposal). I don't really know why the original proposal does not contain this type but "light_rail" was abused a lot at that time (2010/2011), mainly for many German S-Bahn systems which are normal trains. Thank you, user Weide, for pointing me to this issue. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=666777#p666777 Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
