You could always release it under Mozilla Public License 2.0 and that explicitely requires people to offer source code.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Nicolás Alvarez <[email protected]> wrote: > 2017-10-17 13:27 GMT-03:00 Safwat Halaby <[email protected]>: > > I understand that GPLv3 has a loophole in which someone could modify > > your GPL-licensed code, and then run it on a server which offers some > > service. Since a service is being sent over the wire, and not the > > executable itself, then they can keep their modified code private. AGPL > > prevents this loophole. > > > > Does the same logic apply for OSM bots? Would someone using a > > personally modified GPL'ed bot not have to publish it? Should I use > > AGPL instead if I wish to force any bot user to publish the code? > > If I run a modified bot against the OSM server, that doesn't mean you > are interacting with my bot over the network, so even with AGPL I'm > not required to give you the source code. > > -- > Nicolás > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
