On 02/11/17 09:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > ONE tag to say what? You are still owing an answer to this.
I think the problem is similar to the multiple areas problem. There are several layers of complexity so should landuse=residential enclose the whole area including the grass and wooded areas or should they all be isolated areas? Adding leisure=park within landuse=residential area just makes things even more difficult? Just what is a small area of trees? within the leisure=park or landuse=forest because it's not a natural=wood 'creation' ... it's something the planning authorities have requested as perhaps a barrier or simply as an amenity ... or has been preserved as it has been there for hundreds of years ... We need to build a proper hierarchy of LANDUSE into which more detail can be added if required? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
