On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:05 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30/11/2017 13:46, Daniel Koć wrote: > >> 1. Currently leisure=nature_reserve (old scheme) and boundary=* (new >> scheme) are frequently tagged in parallel, and it looks like the old scheme >> is used as a hack just to make it visible on default map. >> > > Just to chuck one example in - I've tagged lots of > "leisure=nature_reserve" and almost no "boundary=protected_area; > protect_class=XYZ". The reason is simple - nature reserves where I'm > likely to be mapping often have a sign saying "XYZ nature reserve". There > isn't going to be a sign helping me work out what "protect_class" in OSM it > is, so that doesn't get mapped. It's also nothing to do with "what gets > rendered"; I actually render my own maps and map quite a lot of stuff that > isn't displayed there :) > Seems like it wouldn't be too difficult to consider the two as equivalent.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
