Hi John IMHO (but others disagree), the model in SIT is simply to number the levels sequentially , starting with 0 (where ever the appropriate ground floor is) and leave everything else to labelling/naming of levels. But as already said, others disagree and we even already make a bit of an allowance for directly using the level numbering in non straight forward cases with non_existent_levels.
I would suggest moving the discussion to the tagging list or better the indoor forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=67). Simon Am 21.12.2017 um 17:21 schrieb John Karr: > > Hello All, > > > > I hope this is the correct mailing list to ask this question. I'm new > to the OSM community and had a question which I hear is very > controversial. I’m part of a team working on an app for indoor > navigation using simple indoor tagging. The audience for this app are > individuals who are blind/low-vision so that they can navigate indoor > spaces. I'm wondering how best to handle fractional levels when > parsing the repeat_on tag. Currently, the project does not account for > fractional levels and everyone involved seems to have a different > opinion on the matter, but not very many solutions emerged from the > discussion. And with that question more seem to arise. For instance, > how common are fractional levels mapped in the indoor plans? Are there > any standards or best practices associated with determining which > fraction to dub a level (i.e. 1.5, 1.2, 1.02, etc.)? I would love to > know how the community feels about this topic and how best to proceed. > Also if anyone has an example of a repeat_on tag that contains > fractional levels and how those are expressed that would be very much > appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > John Karr > Technology Product Research - Programmer I > American Printing House for the Blind > 1839 Frankfort Avenue > Louisville, KY 40206-3148 > [email protected] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
