In Annapolis, Maryland, for instance: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/158283000 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/157577529 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150949243
All of the points for which I've reviewed the history were created ten years ago, edited nine years ago, by the same accounts, and have not been updated since. It seems the same issue was brought up on the forum a couple of years ago ( https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53057), and the suggestion was that landuse polygons were probably most appropriate, and place=subdivision was next-best. I don't think I can effectively armchair-map landuse in cities, but hamlets in densely populated areas clearly don't meet the wiki definition (and, I'd argue, are distinct on-the-ground situations; an isolated hamlet in a rural area is very different than an urban neighbourhood or subdivision). I'm leaning towards place=neighbourhood as being more correct than place=hamlet, although it clearly leaves room for improvement in the form of proper landuse polygons and local knowledge re: names. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote: > can you post some examples? > > > cheers, > Martin > -- Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
