Hi Maarten, I am the developer of that layer.
Am 13.04.2018 um 07:20 schrieb Maarten Deen: > On 2018-04-13 05:02, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote: >> OSM Inspector tags some individual address nodes as errors. For >> example, these nodes located inside the lateral boundaries of >> buildings: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5438712543#map=19/39.68899/-104.86454 >> >> >> I guess I'm reading it wrong, but I can't seem to locate anything >> specifically on the wiki that refers to this. Is there some >> documentation I can refer to which addresses this specific situation? > > Maybe it's complaining about the description tag without having some > other tag to indicate what this node is? Jochen answered the question already. That's the reason. Node 5438712543 has a description tag. That tag should only be used if the object represents something on the ground. If the node had a proper feature tag (e.e. shop=*, amenity=*), it would be ok. However, your node is just an address with a description. The aim of the view is to find objects (usually POIs) lacking proper tagging added by newbies and objects added by low-quality SEO spammers. The list of good and bad tags can be found on the wiki or you look it up in the source code. https://github.com/geofabrik/osmi_simple_views/blob/master/src/tagging_view_handler.cpp#L360 I did a few iterations when I developed that view in order to get not too much false positives. However, I don't know all "good" tags. So please write an email to i...@geofabrik.de or create an issue on GitHub or create a pull request if you think that a tag is missing. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list email@example.com https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk