On the other hand, if editing software checked for some particular
software, the bot would have nothing to do.
So, maybe the bot is a good temporary solution until the map editors have
it implemented?
Also, it would be a good way to detect edits with new software that hes no
checking implemented.

On 4 April 2018 at 17:08, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > * do not message the same person twice about the same kind of problem
>
> and I would support this.  The other problem is how recent was the
> mapping.  If its more than a week old they may have corrected the way they
> work after it had been brought to their attention by another mapper.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 4 April 2018 at 10:53, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04/04/18 10:44, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
>> > What do you think about it? Are such bots useful or not?
>>
>> The bot programmer must take extreme care not to make their bot an
>> annoyance. In my opinion this would include:
>>
>> * do not message the same person twice about the same kind of problem
>>
>> * at the very least allow mappers to "opt out" of bot messaging, or
>> ideally use an opt-in where when someone submits a changeset, they don't
>> only tick "I would like someone to review my changeset" but also "I am
>> willing to receive automated messages about this changeset"
>>
>> Bye
>> Frederik
>>
>> --
>> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>


-- 
--
http://tnij.com/WyszukiwarkaRowerowa     http://jolanta.korwin-mikke.pl/
r.mi...@pl.vwfsag.de        ryszard.mi...@gmail.com

دراجة أكبر
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to