On the other hand, if editing software checked for some particular
software, the bot would have nothing to do.
So, maybe the bot is a good temporary solution until the map editors have
Also, it would be a good way to detect edits with new software that hes no
On 4 April 2018 at 17:08, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > * do not message the same person twice about the same kind of problem
> and I would support this. The other problem is how recent was the
> mapping. If its more than a week old they may have corrected the way they
> work after it had been brought to their attention by another mapper.
> Cheerio John
> On 4 April 2018 at 10:53, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
>> On 04/04/18 10:44, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
>> > What do you think about it? Are such bots useful or not?
>> The bot programmer must take extreme care not to make their bot an
>> annoyance. In my opinion this would include:
>> * do not message the same person twice about the same kind of problem
>> * at the very least allow mappers to "opt out" of bot messaging, or
>> ideally use an opt-in where when someone submits a changeset, they don't
>> only tick "I would like someone to review my changeset" but also "I am
>> willing to receive automated messages about this changeset"
>> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>> talk mailing list
> talk mailing list
talk mailing list