Somehow I don't see anything on the wiki page that supports this lengthy thread.
The issue may be that there are (at least) two ways to map a toilet facility: - rough, one node or area for the whole thing, indicating that unisex, female and male apply to the options available within, making it diffifult to determine what is exactly implied, - detailed: a node, entrance or room per toilet "room", for which the three tags make perfect sense. It would seem that a simple way to make the tagging in the first case less ambivalent would be to add a tag segregated=yes/no (so a unisex=yes segregated=yes facility would only have gender specific rooms, with segregated=no you could expect at least one unisex room). Simon Am 26.04.2018 um 09:15 schrieb Rory McCann: > On 26/04/18 01:00, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >> If most existing data is using unisex to mean "there are both male and >> female toilets", then it doesn't matter one bit what the wiki says. >> Reusing the tag to mean "there are gender-neutral toilets" will cause >> confusion with that existing data. > > That's one of my original questions. What (if any) data consumers are > using this data/tags? > > If some popular site/app was using it to display a map that's one thing. > If no-one is using the data, and many data contributors (mappers) are > using "unisex=yes" as gender neutral, then it doesn't matter if the wiki > says "it's the same as gender segregated"! 🙂 > > I haven't found any sites/apps/projects using this data/tags. > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
