> I fear that this is only "kicking the can down the road" though because > we'd likely have - just as we have with names - one "default" set of > boundaries where we say "that's the one you get if you don't ask for any > particular one", and the fight would then be on which one that is going
"default" is not required (map/app creator should have a freedom to make decision). The only change required is to allow OVERLAPPING borders which apparently is a normal thing for borders even when there is no war, nobody on the ground to make "ground truth". For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Island _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
