On Saturday 22 December 2018, Simon Poole wrote: > > But even with new material it needs to be clear that the purpose of > the guidelines is to outline "safe" ways to provide appropriate > attribution and not to be an exhaustive list of all ways to so so.
Yes, but second rate attribution is such a clear cut case that it could and should be covered. In particular since the wording of the OdbL is quite clear in attribution being not a technical formality but a matter of actual de facto user experience. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
