I didn’t add my opinion because it seemed clear that most people thought that non-attribution is a problem.
Let the record show that I also strongly support requiring attribution, so that more people will become aware of OSM and perhaps start to improve the data in their area. -Joseph Eisenberg On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:59 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > You write: "Issues with attributing OSM when using our data are nearly as > old as our project. Richard Fairhurst addresses > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-February/082136.html> > the issue of non-compliant attributions in a comprehensive post on the > mailing list. Based on the responses it appears that the issue is not that > important for other mappers or they are resigned to current practices." > > How did you come to this conclusion? I counted 3 people not so interested > in attribution or OK with current state of things and 16 agreeing either > explicitly or implicitly with Richard's assessment that there is a problem. > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
