It isn't worth it, I'm afraid you're loosing your time. Given that the two tags aren't the same (amenity=atm is an atm, atm=yes contains an atm) you'll soon have this one art piece that definitely deserves amenity=atm + atm=no. Or not. If you're not ready to consume OSM data using NOT, AND or OR, don't even start :) Not to say that OSM should be a joyful mess, but to me such apparent redundancy does no harm. A matter of point of view on the best way to describe the same things, that's all. Yves
Le 14 juin 2019 08:57:22 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> a écrit : >Recently in mapping I encountered amenity=atm with atm=yes > >I manually removed atm=yes, but it turns that there is more of such >objects. >I propose to run an automatic edit that will remove atm=yes from all >such objects. >In addition I propose to remove also some other blatant and unnecessary >duplicates. > >So in total I propose to remove > >atm=yes from amenity=atm http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JW8 ><http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JW8> >transportation=fuel from amenity=fuel http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWe ><http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWe> >sustenance=restaurant from amenity=restaurant >http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWh >sustenance=fast_food from amenity=fast_food >http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWc >service=post_office from amenity=post_office >http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWa <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWa> > >as this duplicated tags are unnecessary, unwanted, confusing and >undesirable. >Edits would be split to not create overly large bounding boxes.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
