On Wednesday, 7 August 2019, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > > “This edit was assisted by computer vision” > > is useful metadata, no? > > I use a lot of such datas (traffic sign from mapillary via osmose) > I review it (viewing the picture myself) before any change to avoid some > false positive and to improve localisation. > who 'll made what if I add computer_vision_assisted changeset tag ? > for stat ? why not. > but in this case, it may also be needed to add humain_reviewed, > humain_improved, integration_tools and so... > > currently I put source=mapillary source:date > I see a lot of mappers unable to fill a source tag, > for ex because a major editor doesn't promote enought a changeset > source tag. it would probably be best to start by having at least > the source tag everywhere before pushing for more secondary tags > I agree, mapillary can detect all sorts of temporary signs such as speed limits through roadworks meaning they will always require a human with local knowledge to review.
Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
