you understood me wrong. I meant it was a good example of compliance. it's a fair and correct solution. don't understand why others (including OSMF corporate members) don't do the same.
A terça, 8/10/2019, 20:37, Clifford Snow <[email protected]> escreveu: > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:33 AM Nuno Caldeira < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Speaking of attribution, here's a great example by Microsoft Bing maps, >> that has attribution based on the zoom level, they seem to be using OSM >> buildings and HERE roads >> https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=39.97203083116834~-8.634339&lvl=10&style=r&FORM=BMLOGO >> >> >> Up until they got contacted by OSMF to fix the attribution, nothing will >> happen and won't comply. They do not reply or give lazy excuses when a >> contributor approaches them >> > Nuno I'm confused by your statement on Bing maps. The clearly attribute > OSM when zoomed in. If they only use HERE data when zoomed out, what > requirements do they have to attribute OSM and if so on what basis? When > zoomed in, both HERE and OSM are attributed. > > OT - One of the problems I noticed using two different data sources in > Portugal is roads intersecting buildings. I've never been to Portugal - how > good is OSM compared to HERE? Why can't they drop HERE and just use OSM? > > Best, > Clifford > > -- > @osm_washington > www.snowandsnow.us > OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
