sent from a phone
> On 14. Nov 2019, at 23:25, stevea <[email protected]> wrote: > > But if you DO use that "OSM over-layer," then please: agree with common > sense that those work are derived from OSM, even if they do not contain OSM > data in them. They contain data "helped" by OSM data, so they are derived (I > would argue). I guess the law often doesn’t work like common sense. ODbL says it protects the database or a substantial extract of it. Where’s the data from OSM in this dataset? Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
