23 Dec 2019, 19:59 by [email protected]:
>
>
>
> 23 Dec 2019, 17:59 by [email protected]:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company (via Mapbox),
>>> Snapchat that is using OSM without attribution requirements (funnily
>>> there's plenty of space for a reasonable and visible calculated
>>> mapbox logo and text). They probably don't know, nor that they have
>>> been asked to comply over a year ago, nor have agreed with the
>>> license in every aspect of it when stated using OSM data, nor read
>>> Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed on these repeated offenders, nor
>>> read the multiples reports in mailing lists, nor that they had a
>>> employee that ran for OSMF board.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://map.snapchat.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing is going on for
>>> over a year with these two companies that are corporate members of
>>> OSMF and should be the first ones to give examples. Enough with
>>> excuses.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to do things. If
>> there's space for Mapbox, there's space for OpenStreetMap. But I don't think
>> Snapchat has anything to do with Facebook.
>>
>> Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through Facebook.
>>
> It is quite hard to find place where one
> may report this kind of info using email.
>
> I used > [email protected]> - is anyone aware
> of any better email address for this kind of reports?
>
I also complained at
https://support.mapbox.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360000308212
My request was assigned id 77032
according to the automated email.
Has anyone who complained about
Snapchat to Mapbox can check their
inbox archive and share the request id?
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
