If the terms of use is sufficiently clear, and a couple of warnings have been issued beforehand, then what can possibly happen? This is a rhetorical question. Yves
Le 11 mars 2020 16:10:55 GMT+01:00, Simon Poole <[email protected]> a écrit : > >Am 11.03.2020 um 15:48 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk: >> Mar 11, 2020, 15:37 by [email protected]: >> >> As I wrote (conveniently ignored in the noise of the vigilante >> rampage): " >> >> I guess that people were irritated by describing gentle reminder >about >> license requirements >> using pejorative terms ("deface") where their applicability was >dubious. >Sorry, but that is exactly the appropriate term, and anything that will >inevitably get you on the wrong end of being sued if you do it often >enough, is not a "gentle reminder". >> >> The safe, I admit also the less fun, option, is to simply block >> access after giving any required notice." >> >> And note that in case of OSMF-served tiles no notice is required. >> >I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to tell me about terms that I'm >completely aware off (and in some cases that I actually co-wrote), the >subject matter in this thread is not -just- about the OSMF operated >servers, but of those of OSM-FR and others. > >Simon > >> See https://operations.osmfoundation.org/policies/tiles/ >> >> "Clearly display license attribution." is in explicit requirements, >> and given overloaded servers >> >> "should any users or patterns of usage nevertheless cause problems to >> the service, access may still be blocked without prior notice." >> >> applies anyway. >> >> "access may be withdrawn at any point" is later repeated. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
