Drop down options are not the only choice. You can add your own.
It's not compulsory to use those options. Common sense should be used.
If there's a bridge over, don't add tunnel/culvert to the way going under.
DaveF
On 08/06/2020 15:01, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
YES !, i guess what i am saying i would like to see more drop down
options.
Monday, June 8, 2020 8:36 AM -05:00 from nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com>:
I am not very familiar with the iD editor but I notice that where
a stream and highway cross, what boxes and dropdowns are offered
depends what you have selected.
If you have the stream selected you will be offered
tunnel/culvert/layer/etc as options.
If you have the highway selected you will be offered
bridge/tunnel/ford/etc.
Is this the reason you are not seeing the options you expect?
On 8 Jun 2020, at 10:49 pm, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
<talk@openstreetmap.org
<//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3at...@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
i guss what i am saying, add a tunnel is wrong, when the road
is on the bridge, and the drop down box
says culvert. again i am only seeing the ID map.
i just tried it, it only says add a tunnel, then river is under
bridge.
Monday, June 8, 2020 7:00 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny
via talk <talk@openstreetmap.org>:
Is there anything wrong with that?
Jun 8, 2020, 13:57 by talk@openstreetmap.org
<//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3at...@openstreetmap.org>:
in the ID editor, if you draw a stream - river line,
and it crosses a road, you get a warning, with the
suggestion
add a bridge or tunnel.
Monday, June 8, 2020 5:13 AM -05:00 from Martin
Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
Am Sa., 6. Juni 2020 um 18:02 Uhr schrieb Dave F
via talk <talk@openstreetmap.org
<http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3at...@openstreetmap.org>>:
Do you have an example?
A simple example for a tunnel (here subway) on a
bridge would be this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757824513
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pont_Morand
Whether it's a bridge or tunnel is fairly
easily defined by determining
which is taking the load.
If a tunnel's structure was removed, would
whitewater's above it
collapse? If 'yes' then it's a tunnel.
what I wrote was that - according to some
technical definitions - a tunnel must not have
something above it, it may be sufficient that it
is closed and long enough. I am not sure if we
share these definitions in OSM.
According to the current wiki, "a tunnel is an
underground passage for a road or similar." and
also: "tunnel=* is used for roads, railway line,
canals etc that run underground (in tunnel
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Tunnel>). "
This doesn't appear to be exhaustive / complete,
tunnels could also run underwater, above ground
and potentially in the future even in space, no?
Many current underwater tunnels are also
"underground", as they are often running in a man
made structure (embankment like) on the ground or
below the water body/river in the ground
Cheers
Martin
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
