The issue of diversity is complex. In Africa many of the locals whilst
feeling that it would be nice to have all local mappers they recognise
that the map would not be as complete without the armchair mappers.
Unfortunately when you work in technical areas often you'll see a group
build up expertise over time. These people have the frame work if you
like to to see how things fit together and it is how things like
overpass have come about.
Fredrick is one of those people who has a great deal of knowledge and
OpenStreetMap would be much poorer without him.
It does take time to build up expertise and to take part in the
discussions in a meaningful way. However using terms such as "*This
power dynamic leads to a communication style which includes
misogynistic, hostile, targeting, doxing, unfriendly, competitive,
intimidating, patronising messaging, which is offensive to us and forces
many of us to remain as observers and without the confidence to
participate actively" I think is purely destructive. Recognise that some
of the wording you will come across is pure jargon. It works because the
group the communication is taking place is to some extent closed and
jargon gets the message across effectively and quickly. Communication
that is more general does need the "can a six year old understand this
approach". *
I also have an issue with expecting everyone to conform to a set of
social norms, I can think of at least one mapper who is obsessive over
tiny details and goes to great lengths to get them right on the map.
However his social interactions may seem a bit abrupt to some. His
mapping contributions though are extremely valuable.
I also have an issue with those who say we don't have enough female
mappers. Many females do not map using their own name but will use a
male sounding name to avoid problems. Hence you cannot say with any
accuracy just how many mappers are male orfemale.
If you feel that OpenStreetMap is not open enough then there are forks
that you can join inor you can build your own.
OpenStreetMap does respect local mappers points of view, which I think
addresses your comments about minorities. Which is why the map uses
different conventionsin different places.
However that brings us back to the problem of how decisions are made.
Certainly in Africa the NGOs have played a part in pushing for
consistent tags and tagging standards and I am happy to accept that
those who coordinated the efforts where often white, etc etc but they
did consult with everyone who would talk to them. Things like purdah
can be an issue. Communicating through a six year old because his
mother was in purdah means mother's views may not be communicated easily.
Cheerio John
Celine Jacquin wrote on 2020-12-09 14:06:
Hello everybody
I hope you are all well
We, several groups, chapters, organizations and individuals, have
reacted to the conversation in the osm-talk-list
(https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2020-December/085692.html)
considering that it is an incident symptomatic of the problem we have
faced for many years in the community, which is one of the greatest
obstacles to diversity at all levels of OSM. Time to make a real change.
That is why we have developed a beginning of statement on the
desirable mechanisms to work solidly on the rules of coexistence and
improve diversity.
We bring it to your attention and invite anyone who feels represented
to sign it. Translations are in preparation (any help is welcome):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/130JCTX9ve4H4ORXznmIVTpXiN3TX8nRGA8ayuTZ9ECI/edit?usp=sharing
On behalf of the signatories
Best regards
Céline Jacquin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
