On 09/01/2023 20:17, Snusmumriken wrote:
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 08:21 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to refer to ids
will cause social pressure not to change ids,
Is there actually evidence that would corroborate this claim?
There have definitely been complaints to the DWG when people "resurrect"
old long-deleted nodes, or exhibit "unusual mapping behaviour" such as
never deleting any nodes, and always re-using them in some other
feature. There have also been complaints about changes to objects that
people consider "special" such as https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1
and, er, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/69#map=17/48.06733/12.86258 .
I'm not saying those complaints are defensible, but they do occur.
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
