Am 12.04.2023 um 16:20 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk:
From legal point of view it depends on specifics, but yes it can be legal toIt should be noted that this guideline follows from the concept of Collective Databases in the ODbL and in general of the idea of works that can have multiple independent constituent parts. If what Mapbox is doing is consistent with the licence naturally depends on the specifics as Mateusz write, Marc, do you have a link to the discussion in question?render using odbl+proprietary data.See https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Horizontal_Map_Layers_-_Guideline
Simon
Warning: I am not a lawyer.
Apr 7, 2023, 14:21 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
Hello,
following a discussion on the mailing list talk-fr,
mapbox "improve the map" now feeds their proprietary database,
the one that is displayed on top of the osm
is it acceptable in terms of licensing to render using
odbl+proprietary data?
ethically it's obviously very bad to appropriate user contributions
in this way, does anyone have a contact at their end to try and get
them to return to more ethical behaviour?
on talk-fr, no one from mapbox has replied since this behaviour
was pointed out
Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
