>> > Last I looked (which was a while ago), they did not have >> > any standard means of specification (like XSD), so that needs to be >> > fixed. >> >> Why, you dont need schemata in JavaScript for you object notation, the >> JSON itself is both the definition of the shape and the shape itself >> (content). >> > Schemas are useful for tools, like data transformation tools. If you have a > service that requires JSON and you wish to map other data to it's call or > return values, then it's useful to describe what the service consumes and > produces in some way so that you can graphically create a mapping. With XML > you can do this by having the XSD. However, even with XML this is a problem > with many REST services as they don't have a means of providing the schemas.
How about WADL + XML Schema? http://www.w3.org/Submission/wadl/ > Francis Upton > Oakland Software > [email protected] -- Adam Retter skype: adam.retter tweet: adamretter http://www.adamretter.org.uk _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
