If you raise a bug against the test then the WG will have to make a decision on
the question.
But do they even read those?
There is still no answer to my "every integer-valued xs:decimal could
also be a xs:integer"-bug from last month...
Your answers to the mailing list are way faster
Benito
On 10/14/2013 02:19 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
On 14 Oct 2013, at 12:43, Benito van der Zander wrote:
XQuery 3.0 is explicit that all modules share the same initial context item:
[Definition: The initial context item is a context item that an implementation
can set before processing a query begins. The query body and the prolog of
every module in a query share the same initial context item.]
I had read that before, which is why the post is about XQuery 1...
Then perhaps the test should have a XQuery 3 dependency?
If you think so, then you are free to challenge the test by raising a bug
report.
(My implementation evaluates all variables in a module only once and then
shares the cached value with all
queries that import the module; much more logical like compile and link in
traditional languages)
I don't think that was the intent of the 1.0 spec, but I agree that the spec
was not clear on the point. If you raise a bug against the test then the WG
will have to make a decision on the question.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
