you're right. The answer to this question is 9. I've checked with two XPath 2.0 (i'm assuming XQuery 1.0) processors, and this answer is correct.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, David Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > You would be mistaken > Try it > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 1, 2014, at 1:41 AM, "Mukul Gandhi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think, this is sequence of 7 items. As far as I can recall, the > internal sequence (4,5,6) won't be expanded to get the size of outer > sequence and would contribute one item to this result. > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Misztur, Chris > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Is this a sequence of 7 or 9 items? >> >> ( >> 1, >> 2, >> 3, >> (4,5,6), >> 7, >> 8, >> 9 >> ) >> >> ________________________________ >> >> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. >> Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it >> without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive >> any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without >> the permission of the author. >> >> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail >> > -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
_______________________________________________ [email protected] http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
