> > No. I am aware of that distinction. I was quoting the results obtained > from the example that was quoted. > > ihe@ihe-ThinkPad-T410:~/film$ zorba -q '(1, 2, 4, 3, 5, "", "foo", > <a/>, true, false)[.]' > (no URI):1,41: static warning [zwarn:ZWST0008]: "false": has been > deprecated; use "fn:false()" instead > (no URI):1,35: static warning [zwarn:ZWST0008]: "true": has been > deprecated; use "fn:true()" instead
Those warnings appear to be telling you that Zorba is applying a non-standard meaning to the names true and false, and is warning you that it is doing so. If so you are right, it's not conformant. Michael Kay Saxonica _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
