Just going by the definition of the \w class in MK's XPath 2.0 reference - \w -> a character considered to form part of a word
So it's TS if backtick isn't a word character in your vocabulary. Probably neither the first or the last to get caught by that one. On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:21 PM, David Carlisle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/04/2014 17:09, Ihe Onwuka wrote: >> >> to put that another way why is a backtick (matches \w) deemed more >> wordy than a quote which doesn't match \w. > > > > You cross posted to the wrong lists really, regex syntax is as defined > by schema, not by xsl or xquery, and that defines \w as > > [#x0000-#x10FFFF]-[\p{P}\p{Z}\p{C}] (all characters except the set of > "punctuation", "separator" and "other" characters) > > > By backtick I assume you mean U+0060 [`] which isn't a quotation mark, > it's a grave accent and has unicode class Sk so isn't punctuation, > separator or other. (Sk is "symbols") > > David > > > --~------------------------------------------------------------------ > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/ > or e-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> > --~-- > _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
