Isn't the constraint in this case the test: is p2 a subset of p1?

2016-01-27 11:04 GMT+01:00 Pavel Velikhov <[email protected]>:

>
> > On 27 Jan 2016, at 12:54, W.S. Hager <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Can't we formally proof something as obvious Adam's case?
>
> In Adam’s case we want to test whether path expression p1 subsumes path
> expression p2.
> If we don’t put any conditions on p1 and p2, the problem is undecidable:
> p1 and p2 may include
> function calls, so the expressive power of p1 and p2 are that of a Turing
> Machine.




-- 

W.S. Hager
Lagua Web Solutions
http://lagua.nl
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to