Ah very interesting, thanks Mike. That looks great for named functions.
In XQuery I can also put an Annotation on an Inline Function Expr, is there any equivalent in XSLT? On Sun, 13 Jan 2019, 01:24 Michael Kay <[email protected] wrote: > The XSLT approach to this is to use extension attributes, for example > > <xsl:function name="f:xyz" > acme:use-lazy-evaluation="false">...</xsl:function> > > There's nothing that says such attributes are carried around as properties > of the resulting function object, but there's also nothing that says they > aren't. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > > > On 12 Jan 2019, at 14:24, Adam Retter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Does anyone know if there is something similar in XSLT to XQuery 3.0's > > Annotations? > > > > I am developing a set of XPath functions, which produce functions. > > These produced functions can benefit from being treated in a certain > > manner by a processor. > > > > I was thinking of using custom Annotations to label the produced > > functions, so that a processor would have more information about how > > they should be evaluated. Unfortunately I just realised that > > Annotations are defined in the XQuery spec, not the lower XPath spec > > (as I had assumed). > > > > Is there anything equivalent for functions (produced by functions) in > XSLT? > > > > p.s. I will crosspost to the mulberry XSLT list as this seems relevant > to both. > > > > Thanks Adam. > > -- > > Adam Retter > > > > skype: adam.retter > > tweet: adamretter > > http://www.adamretter.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] > > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
