I think one of the problems with this thread is the lack of specifics about
what we mean by "interpret the lead." I think the "ocho machine" is an extreme
that completely misses the point.
Since the act of leading is a communication, then in one sense, the follower
MUST "interpret" it. She must respond, and as automatic and without-thought as
that process is in good followers, there still is a level of "interpretation."
Her body must "know" or figure out, ie interpret, what the leader wants, and
respond accordingly.
Any experienced leader can tell you that a given lead for a particular step
will elicit slightly different responses in even a group of excellent
followers. So how much and what kind of "interpretation" is acceptable?
So here's a situation. Two women. One with a personality (at least in the
moment) that is a little slow, perhaps she had a tiring day. The other that is
spikey and high energy, perhaps she just finished a double espresso. Each of
them will respond, ie. interpret, the same lead entirely differently. That has
to be acceptable.
So now maybe one of them is into you as a leader/person, and the other is not.
The first might feel like and choose to respond quickly to your lead, "let's
get this over with." The second might feel more inclined to lag a bit, to draw
out the feeling of the moment. Is this not OK too? She is communicating with
you. And since everyone always says that tango is a conversation (which sort of
requires that it's two-way), HOW ELSE would she be able to speak her mind/heart
and hold up her side of the conversation, if not by such slight
"interpretations?"
J
TangoMoments.com
_________________________________________________________________
Local listings, incredible imagery, and driving directions - all in one place!
Find it!
http://maps.live.com/?wip=69&FORM=MGAC01
_______________________________________________
Tango-L mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
