I think the confusion comes from our tendency toward "hero worship" - some teacher said it so it must be true and we can't give it up even faced with a preponderance of facts. I caution students to remember that in group lessons teachers talk to the group, not to the individual. Maybe the class contained lots of beginners, who were unlikely to continue tango past that evening's dance, so an automatic cross was called for. Or the teacher had been dancing so long he didn't know he was leading the cross. Also, things can be misconstrued, especially when you are dealing with someone not communicating in their primary language. I think it is always wise to employ a filter. When I assist Argentines in teaching, they will often say something, yet lead something quite differently. For instance, in a class I was assisting in Buenos Aires, a teacher said "You must lift your partner in the embrace". Feeling it with the teacher, the "lift" was almost imperceptable, and done with the torso. Dancing with the students, I was almost picked up, and squeezed uncomfortably. But they couldn't let go of what they had heard him say.
I have a German student who listens to me so carefully that he overcorrects. It keeps me on my toes, and improves my communication. I seem to remember Fabian Salas saying that a big part of Tango Nuevo was breaking the roles of the giro - maybe leading a back-side-back. Automatic doesn't fit that concept very well. Lois Donnay Minneapolis _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
