As a newly obsessed learner (3mos.) of A.T., I
find it startling the amount of controversy and contention on threads about
Tango technique...what is good form and what isn't, is so heatedly debated that
it often looks more like a war zone than the simple sharing of information. So
much difference of opinion and staunchly defended approaches to also include
such minute nuance/details of posture, balance, muscle groups, exercises, etc.,
etc. that it seems a daunting task to even attempt to do the dance..
And on the other hand, whenever the Milonga (song) is discussed. There is
usually a statement or two, rarely a disagreement, not much in the way of
splitting hairs nor defensiveness and almost no strongly held opinions...
I don't get it. Why is it like that, what's the BIG difference between the two
songs/dances that would produce such a different intellectual approach between
them??
Is it that one is just fun and the other more serious and painful?? What's
up?
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
_______________________________________________
Tango-L mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
