Feel free to start a thread on "The Frame". Sure, you can say that going through the practice of leading with no arms is still a frame. But, it takes away from the point of my post:
To illustrate the suggested lead and an example of practicing the finer points of leading. The intent is for the follower to follow my center, my chest. I suggest with my chest, she follows as far as SHE figures out to follow and I follow her to that end-point. Actually, there is a lot of finer back and forth communication that goes on during this exercise. It creates a heightened awareness for the leader and the follower. By calling it shock and awe, I guess it is being strongly stated that you should not try this at home! However, it is, actually, an exercise that will improve your dance. It keeps the follower and the leader on their toes and a fantastic way: heightened awareness. When I dance, I dance with a very light frame, most of the time. However, this topic was about an exercise that is very beneficial. Also, in a milonga, yes, in a milonga, sometimes, when our connection is poor, I will make my frame so light that it is almost not there. - It makes ME more aware of leading with my center. - It makes ME pay more attention to what she is doing. - It makes my follower more aware of following my center. Then, when I strengthen my frame, the dance is much more beautiful. This is an example of doing the exercise with extremely little frame and has been proven over and over, again. THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK I don't mind the counterpoint arguments. But, I just want to be clear, for those who are looking for ways to improve their lead, this method works wonders. To the many of you who write back to me, personally, and tell me that these principles work, thank you for your feedback. I think that we all find that: (1) those who agree don't write back to the group (2) those who don't agree do write to the group. So, don't let the one or two people who want to say "No! No! No!" detour you from learning the finer points of the dance. --- Alexis Cousein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tango For Her wrote: > > Michael wrote: > > > > "If the frame is weak, she can't track the > center." > > > > > > I just wanted to clarify ... if you go to the > extreme > > of providing no frame for your follower, here is > what > > happens: > > > No. > > If you provide no frame, there is no way to > communicate at all. It's like > having a conversation about philisophy with someone > with your mouth > taped over. > > What you name "no frame" is actually just as much a > frame. It's > just one that uses little static resistance and one > with a little > flexibility and little jerk (as defined in physics - > the derivative > of acceleration). > > It's not weak, it's light. > > If it's really weak, then the follower really has no > way if knowing > where you're going, and she has to feel it when it's > too late (the > tango equivalent to bungee jumping) when an > (incorrect) framing > relationship is eventually re-established. > > No doubt it keeps the follower in her toes, but not > in a good way. > Shock and awe should be reserved for military uses. > _______________________________________________ > Tango-L mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
