I've read the heated discussions about leading with the chest vs arms. In the movie "Cool Hand Luke" which takes place at a prison in the South, Luke upsets the prison warden who strikes him to the ground and says "What we have here is a failure to communicate" and this failure causes flames. I offer an alternative. A good leader doesn't lead exclusively with his chest NOR his arms but with his FRAME. This is the area above his waist, so I essentially lead with my chest AND my arms.
When I read that a man leads with arms, my interpretation is he leads ONLY with his arms. This means he is pulling or pushing the woman and his arms are moving independently of his upper body, instead of in concert with the rest of his upper body. My left arm wasn't acting as part of my frame in the beginning. My chest would lead the woman into a molinete to my left. My left arm didn't rotate with my shoulders and acted as a gate. (I won't go into how I painfully learned to get my left arm to become part of my frame.) When a woman complains of being pulled and pushed, it means she is lead SOLELY by the man's arms. I can only dance in close embrace so that my arms and chest move as part of my frame. My frame envelops the woman like a frame around a painting or a seat belt to hold a person snugly in a car. At times, I wonder if posters are talking about the same thing, just using different terms that throw others off track. Michael Ditkoff Washington, DC Atlanta Tango Festival in March followed by BA in April -- I'd rather be dancing Argentine Tango _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
