bulls� wrote:
http://www.ebcvg.com/articles.php?id=296
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,97157,00.
html

kenapa ?

thanks


walaupun judulnya ofensif, ada baiknya kita baca selengkapnya,

Linux becomes the de facto gatekeeper and therefore the target of choice
for large and desirable targets.
<<'desirable', mengapa? karena biasanya server linux memang dijadikan
ujung tombak, dan yang menangani beban paling berat dari keseluruhan
sistem>>

The report does not include the number of failed attacks versus
successful attacks, so we don't really know how secure or insecure the
OS's are on their own
<<nah kan, artikel ini belum berupa fakta, tapi masih dalam penelitian. angka unsuccessful attacknya tidak/belum didapat>>
.
.
.
At the end of the day this isn't about which OS is best. And it isn't
about security through obscurity
.
.
.
Taken in perspective, these results may be surprising and even
encouraging for Apple and BSD fans, but at the granular level, 10,000
successful attacks is still 10,000 successful attacks
<<jadi angka 10.000 (sebenarnya 11.327, karena dihitung dari 4.82% total
serangan terhadap 235.000 server) serangan yang berhasil terhadap BSD
dan MacOSX, masih terlalu besar. jadi, judul tinggal judul>>


jangan setengah-setengah...

--
*/-----------------------
ov3rr|d3 is not ov3rwr|t3
ov3rr|d3 is not ov3rdr|v3
Linux user number  370493
-----------------------*/




-- Unsubscribe: kirim email kosong ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arsip, FAQ, dan info milis di http://linux.or.id/milis.php Tidak bisa posting? Baca: http://linux.or.id/wiki/index.php?pagename=ProblemMilisDanSolusi http://linux.or.id/wiki/index.php?pagename=TataTertibMilis



Kirim email ke