+1 from me too. -Harish
On 5/11/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been thinking that I want to change the <inject-state> element > into something more generalized. > > I was just thinking about how cool it would be to be able to inject a > compiled script template (an IScript instance). The approach would be > similar to injecting state. This it hit me, that these are two > different strategies, so. > > <inject-state property="foo" object="visit"/> > > Would become: > > <inject-special property="foo" type="state" value="visit"/> > > And we could add: > > <inject-special property="foo" type="script" value="MyScript.script"/> > > .... then I realized that <inject> is itself just a special case, > where the type is, for example, "object" (meaning, an object resolved > using HiveMind).. So we can just make "object" the default for type > and do-away with <inject-state> (and <inject-special>), i.e. > > <inject property="request" value="infrastructure:request"/> > <inject property="visit" type="state" value="visit"/> > <inject property="script" type="script" value="MyScript.script"/> > > Thoughts? > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
