-1 (non-binding) on the conversion right now. I'm with Geoff (not that my vote matters. ;). I realize that subversion may be nicer to work with than cvs. However, we've gotten through tapestry 4.0 beta 1 using cvs... what's a little longer? As a user, I'd rather see tapestry 4.0 final out the door before a migration of source control systems. (+1 on the conversion after 4.0 final is released) Robert
Geoff Longman wrote: > I'm sure subversion is great and all that..but is there a reason to > this *right now* beyond the fact that: 1) everybody is doing it and 2) > it went ok for others? > > Would not the release of Tapestry 4.0 final be a logical point to make > the transition? > > Geoff > > On 6/25/05, Jamie Orchard-Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Jamie Orchard-Hays: +1 >> >>On Jun 25, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> >> >>>Worked great for HiveMind ! >>> >>>Howard M. Lewis Ship: +1 >>> >>>-- >>>Howard M. Lewis Ship >>>Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant >>>Creator, Jakarta Tapestry >>>Creator, Jakarta HiveMind >>> >>>Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support >>>and project work. http://howardlewisship.com >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
