Did you mean, perhaps, persist="session:page"? On 7/5/05, Jamie Orchard-Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a good idea and I would add persist="client:session". > > Jamie > > Mind Bridge wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It seems to me that persist='client' may currently be quite problematic in a > > real application, as the properties persisted in that way would be dragged > > across the entire applciation. It is an excellent functionality, but it > > seems to me it could be rather problematic in real situations in its current > > state. > > > > I would suggest to have a way to define the scope of the persistance, so > > that when you leave the page, for example, the property would be forgotten. > > > > Here is a possibility: > > > > persist="client:page" > > > > I see three scopes that would be easily at the moment: 'request', 'page', > > and 'application'. The default could be 'page'. > > > > This mechanism is very easy to implement with minor modifications of the > > existing facilities. > > > > I would also suggest us to have a specific deadline for beta-2. This would > > guarantee that all such mods would get in by then and would know what to > > expect. > > > > Comments? > > > > Best regards, > > -mb > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
