Before I started to convert our current project to T4, I was against the default bindings. But I have to say that I don't dislike them at all finally. Most of the time the default binding is quite intuitive, the prefixes have been bringing many other kinds of issues that far (mostly because documentation is still missing)...
Henri. On 7/20/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the new betas out, I'm thinking that it's become easier to > discuss the binding prefixes. > > I like how succinct the prefixes are but if we can get a consensus, we > can change things around. > > I would suggest that, if we remove explicit default binding prefixes > on parameters, we still use a simpler system of defaults: literal: > for HTML (or other templates), ognl: for XML and elsewhere (such as > annotations). > > <form jwcid="@Form" listener="doSubmit"> > > vs. > > <form jwcid="@Form" listener="listener:doSubmit"> > > vs. > > <form jwcid="@Form" listener="ognl:listeners.doSubmit"> > > > I prefer #1, but would be satisified with #2. Either is better than > #3 (as it stands in Tapestry 3.0). > > What are people finding now that they are (hopefully) playing with Tapestry? > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Thanks, Henri. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
